Refutation

1. What is my thesis?
To make citizen quit smoking,  it is better to design tobacco package with warning labels of smoking than increasing its price.

2. What is the opposite position?

Warning labels on tobacco package sometimes cannot work.

3. What arguments can I anticipate?
a) Sometimes, people skip the tobacco package(not looking). 

b) In NY, there are people who sell only one cigar.(he will not receive the effect of warning labels)

c) what if the smoker is accustomed to that image?

4. How will I counter those arguments?

a) But, the smoker is obliged to face that horrible image that warns him or her.

b) It is illegal behavior and NY does not implement that regulation yet.

c) The cover may often changes. Also, I don't think that smokers can be accustomed to the image, because it is  provocative enough.  

My Refutation and Concession

 Obviously, my opinion cannot be applied to all people. There are people who do not mind provocative images or do not believe warning images. However, although some smoker do not mind that, it is meaningful, because they can definitely see that smoking is harmful through threatening images.   

 Also, in NY, there are people who are selling only one cigar and it can be occur in Korea, too. Then, buyer do not have to watch warning image on the tobacco package. However, it is illegal clearly. In addition, The seller are likely to go where multiple people convene., so, catching him or her will be not that big problem.