1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.
I will start with the current Korean law revision, which is related to increasing tobacco price. Then, I'll have question about its effectiveness. Also, I'll mention the example of the other countries like Australia and France, where the warning label on the tobacco package is implemented and show its effectiveness. Finally, I will end with my thesis, "To make citizen quit smoking, it is better to design tobacco package with warning labels of smoking than increasing its price."2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.
I will summarize the survey and research I've found and provide an explanation for psychological effects related to my argument which will help audience to understand. Also, the examples of the other countries will be used to persuade them.3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.
I will start by introducing the many kinds of anti-smoking policy, especially warning labels on tobacco package and increasing its price. Then, I'll examine the limits of increasing cigarette price by using real examples or surveys. Furthermore, I'll prove reasons why warning label is more effective through suggesting psychological theories.
4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.
I will concede that increasing tobacco price also contributes to decreasing smoking rate in some aspects, but suggest its limits, which is only restricted to the people who have economic difficulties. I'll take an example of Australia, where is implementing one of the largest health warnings on cigarette package. Also, I'll add the opinion of Korean smokers who don't like to quit smoking even if the price of cigar is increased.5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.
I will close with a summary of my reasons then put a importance of its effects.
Finally, I'll end with mentioning my thesis.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기